Posts in Societal Things
Activists Vs. Agitators

Disclaimer: Everything you’re about to read is speculative, but I think it could explain why a lot of the violence, looting, and destruction occurring at the protests following George Floyd’s murder seems to be initiated by a small group of agitators.

It’s no secret that many of the protests occurring around the county have turned quite violent as night falls, and many people are wondering who is causing the violence. There’s not really a clear answer to that, but there are a few theories.

The most common theory of who is behind the violence at these protests seems to be that Antifa is bussing people into these cities to wreak havoc. This theory is usually coupled with the idea that a segment of unruly “animalistic” black people are showing their “true nature” at these riots because the opportunity has presented itself. The theory about Antifa seems like it could hold water (given the many out-of-state arrests that have been made), but anyone propagating the theory about “opportunistic” black people indulging their “animalistic” nature is an irrefutable racist.

In fact, there’s a lot of evidence that suggests most of the violence is being started by white people. There are two reasonable explanations for this. The first explanation could be that Trump supporters and other extremely conservative white people are showing up to the protests to cause trouble, hoping to turn the protests into violent riots to delegitimize them. However, I don’t think a terribly large number of Trump supporters are smart enough to come up with such a plan on their own, but maybe I'm wrong (hopefully I’m not though, because that would mean conservatives are trying to sabotage the protests and maintain the status quo of systemic racism and police brutality).

The second, and I believe the most likely, explanation is that the violence is being caused by a completely unorganized group of extremely liberal white people who make up the ugly, selfish underbelly of the progressive movement. Based on my own observations, that group consists largely of white people who self identify as queer or trans, and likely subscribe unquestioningly to far left ideologies like socialism or Marxism. Not all, but a large percentage of people who fall into those categories are people who have been radicalized and trained by leftist media outlets to feel incredibly oppressed by society and the state in general; they have long been told by the media and by politicians that they’re oppressed as a way to stoke their political engagement, and while there’s no denying that LGB people, trans people, and those with far-left viewpoints have historically been oppressed, their experiences generally pale in comparison to those of black people in this country. I think those radicalized individuals are capitalizing on the current unrest by inciting violence and destroying property as a way to vent their own frustrations with the system (valid or not) under the premise of activism.

If this assessment is correct, then what those white people need to understand is that using a movement about race as a release for their own frustrations is irresponsible, ignorant, and selfish. In doing so, they’re only propagating the systematic injustices that black people face, because their actions are contributing to the right wing media’s ability to delegitimize these protests, thereby squandering the chance we have to affect real change.

It’s worth noting that while violence at protests is generally not helpful, if the police abuse protestors, then they should fight back. And don’t get me wrong, I understand that a bit of destruction usually comes with successful protests, and no amount of destroyed property is worth more than a single person’s life. But having these protests turning into violent spectacles of fire and broken glass do not help black people in the long run, regardless of whether black people are the agitators or not. The people who are breaking into Apple stores, destroying gas stations, looting Gucci stores, and burning small businesses to the ground are either selfish or shortsighted, probably both.

White people do have a role to play in the fight against racism, but no matter what other persecution or injustices those white people may face, their role does not involve selfishly co-opting the Black Lives Matter movement as a way to vent. To do so is just as delegitimizing as saying “all lives matter”. Intentionally or not, they’re missing the point.

An Actual Example of ‘Fake News’

This is astounding.

”Fake news” is not when someone in the media reports something that exposes your wrongdoings, as the president believes. But when a media conglomerate issues the exact same, scripted narratives with obvious political bias to local news stations to present to their audiences as independent stories, that is undeniably fake news.

Check this list to find out which of your local news stations are owned by Sinclair, and then never tune into their programming again.

CNN Reporter Arrested On Air During Minneapolis Protests

It’s astonishing to see the constitution crumble before our eyes. We are clearly living in a police state where the freedom of the press matters less and less each day. At first it was just the president trying to delegitimize the media, but clearly the sentiment that journalists and reporters are “enemies of the state” has permeated the system to the lowest levels, down from the very top.

Adjustments.jpeg

These cops look like mindless, robotic thugs. You can see it in their blank stares as Jimenez is explaining to them his status as a member of the press. They don’t care that he’s trying to comply with them, they’ve decided that they want to arrest him (presumably for the crime of being in public during a protest while black) and don’t know how to respond because he didn’t resist their request. So they just waited, confused for a minute, and then proceeded to arrest him anyway. Atrocious.

God save America.

A Murderer Called ‘Chauvin’

Admittedly, it’s a bit bush league to make fun of someone’s name. But I find it incredibly fitting that the presumably tiny-cocked, white police officer who brutally murdered a handcuffed black man is called “Chauvin”.

For additional context, note that Chauvin has been involved in three other police shootings (in each case, the person he was shooting at was a person of color), and he had a dozen complaints lodged against him during his time with the Minneapolis Police Department.

From The American Heritage Dictionary:

Chauvinism (n):

  1. Militant devotion to and glorification of one's country; fanatical patriotism.

  2. Prejudiced belief in the superiority of one's own gender, group, or kind.

Fits like a glove.

Four days after his execution of George Floyd, Derek Chauvin has (finally) been arrested and (insufficiently) charged with third degree murder and manslaughter. As of yet, Chauvin’s three accomplices have not been arrested.

If you aren’t outraged and disgusted by the lack of justice in this case, you are no patriot.

Taylor Swift and Twitter Punish Trump for Inciting Racism and Glorifying Violence

Hiding Trump’s tweet with an explanation that he broke the rules by “glorifying violence” is is certainly a better response than adding a little “get the facts about…” label to his bile. Hopefully Twitter will have the balls to keep enforcing their rules more forcefully*; the past few days do seem like steps in the right direction.

Taylor Swift’s response was certainly a bit more pointed than Twitter’s, however. Enjoy:

I wonder if this plus her statement about Marsha Blackburn has resulted in Trump now liking her music 50% less?

*If you think this is a violation of free speech, think again (or read the constitution). Trump has the freedom to say whatever he likes, but Twitter, a private company, is under no constitutional obligation to give him a microphone.

Podcast Host's Poignant Monologue On Black Murder As A Spectacle

In the wake of George Floyd’s murder, Akilah Hughes, host of Crooked Media’s daily news podcast “What A Day”, had a powerful, raw monologue about racism and police brutality that pointed out the disturbing tendency our society has to consume footage of black people being murdered as if it’s entertainment.

I found Akilah’s monologue to be very moving, and I think it’s important that we listen to black voices on subjects that deal with racial injustice. Check out the episode for yourself.

Popular Christian Singer Stops Believing, Starts Thinking

Singer/songwriter/musician Jon Steingard, the lead vocalist for Christian band Hawk Nelson (known for popular songs like “Drops In The Ocean”) posted a well written message on his Instagram explaining how he came to the realization that he no longer believed in god.

This is not a post l ever thought that I would write, but now I feel like I really need to. I've agonized over whether to say this publicly, and if so, how to do it, but I now feel that it's less important howI do it, and more important thatI do it. So here goes.

After growing up in a Christian home, being a pastor's kid, playing and singing in a Christian band, and having the word "Christian" in front of most of the things in my life - I am now finding thatI no longer believe in God.

The last few words of that sentence were hard to write. I still find myself wanting to soften thatstatement by wording it differently or less specifically - but it wouldn't be as true.

The process of getting to that sentence has been several years in the making. It didn't happen overnight or all of a sudden. It's been more like pulling on the threads of a sweater, and one day discovering that there was no more sweater left.

I have been terrified to be honest about this publicly for quite some time, because of all that I thought I would lose. I'm still scared, but I'm writing about this now for a few reasons.

Firstly, I simply can no longer avoid it. Processing this quietly felt right when I simply had doubts, but once they solidified into a genuine point of view, it began to feel dishonest not to talk about it.

Secondly, I have had private conversations with trusted friends about my doubts, and discovered to my absolute shock that they are shared by nearly every close friend my age who also grew up in the church. I am stunned by the number of people in visible positions within Christian circles that feel the same way as I do. Like me, they fear losing everything if they're open about it. I hope that my openness and transparency can be an encouragement to them, and to you, if you feel the same.

Thirdly, I've got a whole lot less to lose now. The band isn't playing shows or making new music at the moment, and we've all found other work and careers to focus on for the time being. In order to make sure I'm able to keep providing for my family, that had to be the case before I could be totally honest and that fact is one of the issues I have with the church and Christian culture in general.

So if you're someone who follows me because of Hawk Nelson, and my involvement in Christian music, you are probably thinking, "Wait - were you lying to me this whole time? Were you just pretending to be a Christian? What about all those songs you wrote? Did you mean those?" 

The short answer is that I was not lying. I did believe those things at the time. I may have been pulling on the threads of the sweater, but there was still some sweater left back then.

So what did this sweater-thread-pulling process look like then? Ok let's get into it.

I grew up in a loving Christian home. My dad was a pastor (and still is), and as far back as I can remember, life was all about the church. It was our Community. It was our family. 

It feels important to point out that church wasn't something we went to once a week - it was more like something we came home to as often as possible, after bravely venturing out into "the world" when necessary. It wasn't a part of our life. It was our life.

When you grow up in a community that holds a shared belief, and that shared belief is so incredibly central to everything, you simply adopt it. Everyone I was close to believed in God, accepted Jesus into their hearts, prayed for signs and wonders, and participated in church, youth groups, conferences, and ministry. So I did too.

I became interested in music, began playing and singing on worship teams, and started leading worship at church and youth events. Even then I remember being uncomfortable with certain things. Praying in public always felt like some kind of weird performance art. Emotional cries such as "Holy Spirit come fill this place" always felt clunky and awkward leaving my lips. A youth conference I attended encouraged every teen to sign a pledge that they would "date Jesus" for a year. It felt manipulative and unsettling to me. I didn't sign it.

I figured I was overthinking all these things. This was the beginning of my doubt, and I began to develop the reflex to simply push it down, and soldier on. After all - everyone I knew and loved believed in God, Jesus, and the Bible. So I felt it must be true.

At the age of 20 I joined Hawk Nelson and began touring with the band. It was a blast. Our music wasn't overtly "Christian", but as time went on we became more outspoken about our faith in our music. To be fair, I was one of the loudest voices pushing for that shift, because I believed it would lead to more success in the Christian music world.

When I became the lead singer and main songwriter in 2012, this shift was fully realized. We went from singing songs like "Bring 'Em Out" to songs like "Drops In The Ocean". Google the lyrics - the difference is not subtle.

Even through this shift, there were still many things about Christian culture that made me uncomfortable. In fact, the list was growing. There were things that just didn't make sense to me. 

If God is all loving, and all powerful, why is there evil in the world? Can he not do anything about it? Does he choose not to? Is the evil in the world a result of his desire to give us free will? Ok then, what about famine and disease and floods and all the suffering that isn't caused by humans and our free will? If God is loving, why does he send people to hell?

My whole life people always said, "You have to go back to what the Bible says".

I found, however, that consulting and discussing the Bible didn't answer my questions, it only amplified them.

Why does God seem so pissed off in most of the Old Testament, and then all of a sudden he's a loving father in the New Testament? Why does he say not to kill, but then instruct Israel to turn around and kill men women and children to take the promised land? Why does God let Job suffer horrible things just to.. win a bet with Satan?! Why does he tell Abraham to kill his son (more killing again) and then basically say "just kidding! That was a test." Why does Jesus have to die for our sins (more killing again)? If God can do anything, can't he forgive without someone dying? I mean, my parents taught me to forgive people - nobody dies in that scenario.

I was raised to believe that the Bible was the perfect Word of God. Sure, it was written by human beings, but those people were divinely inspired - and we can consider the words they wrote to be the Word of God.

I began to have questions and doubts about that. It seemed like there were a lot of contradictions in the Bible that didn't make sense. I don't want to get too deep in the weeds here so l'lI leave the details for another time. Suffice it to say that when I began to believe that the Bible was simply a book written by people as flawed and imperfect as I am that was when my belief in God truly began to unravel.

During a vacation to Mexico with my wife's family, I had a revealing conversation with my father-in-law, who is also a pastor. Like my dad, he is a loving father. He is patient and sincere, and believes in God with all his heart.

I was asking about a verse in 1 Timothy that seems really oppressive of women. It indicates that women shouldn't be in church leadership, shouldn't teach men, and shouldn't wear their hair in braids. To me, that seemed less like the message of the loving God that most Christians believe in now, and more like the ideas that would have been present in the culture at the time... a male-dominated society where women were treated less like equals and more like property. 

My father in law asked me if I had been reading the King James Version - because he felt that King James had put his own spin on a lot of things, and that version couldn't fully be trusted. 

“You have to go back to the original Greek" he said. 

This is something I've heard a lot over the years. I asked him, "So it sounds like you believe that modern translations can't fully be trusted, because they are human, flawed, and imperfect. I am simply taking that thought to its next natural conclusion - that the original Greek is also human, flawed, and imperfect, and also can't fully be trusted."

He replied, "Well, if you believe that, what do you have left?" 

I said, "Exactly."

Once I found that I didn't believe the Bible was the perfect Word of God - it didn't take long to realize that I was no longer sure he was there at all. That thought terrified me. It sent me into a tailspin. The implications of that idea were absolutely massive.

I began to ask myself, "What now?"

Over the past year I've occasionally mentioned publicly my struggles with depression. This is what really kicked that off. 

What do you do when the rug is pulled out from under your feet? When you find yourself no longer believing the thing at the core of how you see yourself and see the world? What do I teach my own children? If I'm honest about this, will all my Christian friends abandon me? Will this alienate me from my family? Will this leave me with nothing?

Those are the questions that led me into a very dark place for a while.

I feel like I've mostly emerged from that dark place now because I’ve discovered that life really does go on. I have trusted friends that know this about me, and love me anyways. My family is showing me incredible love and support, even though I know this grieves them. While I know I can no longer stand on stage and in good conscience sing songs like "Drops In The Ocean", I no longer fear losing my place in Christian music. I know this means giving it up voluntarily.

I'm ready to be transparent and open. 

I think that "open" part is key.

I'm open to the idea that God is there. l'd prefer it if he was. I suspect if he is there, he is very different than what I was taught. I know my parents pray that God reveals himself to me. If he's there, I hope he does. 

Until then - I feel like the best thing I can do is be honest. 

Stepping away from belief in God has felt like a loss in some ways - but it's felt like freedom in others. Jess and I both always had this sense that we weren't doing enough of the things we were supposed to do as Christians. We didn't enjoy going to church. We didn't enjoy reading the Bible. We didn't enjoy praying. We didn't enjoy worship. It all felt like obligation, and our lack of enthusiasm about those things always made us feel like something was wrong with us. 

Now I don't believe anything was wrong with us. We simply didn't believe and we were too afraid to admit that to ourselves. So in that sense, we have a tremendous sense of relief now.

I am hoping that writing this contributes to that relief. As I've processed these thoughts and feelings over the past year or so, Ive avoided writing online about matters of faith. I didn't want to pretend to believe anything I didn't believe - but I also didn't want to rock the boat. 

I am not sure how much this will rock the boat. I don't know if this will surprise anyone. But it doesn't matter. What matters is that I've finally worked up the courage to tell my story. To share my deepest truth. And that feels like freedom too.

It's going to be 72 degrees here in San Diego today.The sun is shining. It's a beautiful day. No sweater needed.

It’s thorough and does a good job of summing up many of the concerns and unaddressable questions I personally dealt with, having also been raised in an obsessively Christian household and community.

The ‘Apple Store Index’ for Post-Coronavirus Economic Reopening

Josh Centers, writing at The Prepared:

Of course, Apple isn’t the only company in the world that’s hurt its bottom line in an effort to stem the tide of COVID-19, but what makes Apple particularly interesting is its enormous cash stockpile: $207.6 billion as of Q1 2020.

What that pile of cash means is that Apple isn’t desperate. Unlike say, a restaurant with deep debt and thin margins, or a hair salon with the rent coming due and no income, Apple isn’t forced to risk spreading a plague to keep the doors open. It has the enviable position to hold off until it’s safe for both its employees and customers. […]

Apple, being a wildly successful business even in the worst economic conditions, can withstand a lot more pressure to re-open than any politician. While many governors are having their arms figuratively twisted by President Trump and angry protestors, no one will be calling for Tim Cook’s head until at least Apple’s Q2 earnings report, due on April 30, 2020. Even then, years of strong performance under Cook and his prior experience in dealing with shareholder uprisings will insulate him for a long time.

So for that reason, no matter what my governor says, I won’t consider stepping into a crowd until Apple gives the all-clear.

I’ve been using this index — albeit untitled — since early March when Apple announced that they were closing all of their stores worldwide (apart from mainland China). The announcement itself was almost unbelievable, and it came well before other companies. This was when the threat of COVID-19 really became serious for me. Having worked in Apple’s retail stores for years, I have a deep trust in their threat assessment teams, and I trust Apple’s leadership to use the information those teams provide to make the most responsible decisions for their customers and employees. It was clear at that point that we were facing something unprecedented. In hindsight, it’s was clear that at that if Apple knew about the true gravity of the threat at that point, then so did the government, and they were keeping us in the dark.

Check out CopyrightBro’s COVID-19 coverage roundup.

Ahmaud Arbery’s Murderers Arrested

Steve Almasy and Angela Barajas, reporting for CNN:

Two men involved in the fatal shooting of Ahmaud Arbery near Brunswick, Georgia, have been arrested and face murder and aggravated assault charges, according to the Georgia Bureau of Investigation.

Gregory McMichael and his son, Travis McMichael, were taken into custody, the GBI said Thursday evening.

If you can watch this video and still wonder if the murderer’s aren’t getting fair coverage, you’re a fucking idiot. No pun intended, but this case is 100% black and white. There is no guesswork to be done, no grand mystery to solve, no hidden motives to uncover, nothing. This murder was a premeditated hate crime, and it’s a shame that it took three months for the white trash murderers to be arrested. Here’s to hoping they’re convicted swiftly and receive the death penalty.

Sixteen Personalities

To anyone unfamiliar with Myers-Briggs personality types: buckle up, you’re in for a treat. A website called 16personalities.com has developed a personality type assessment that uses decades worth of research to provide people with a way to understand human personalities on a deep level. After taking their personality assessment, your result will be one of 16 possible combinations of letters (such as ESTJ, ISFJ, or ENFP) in which each letter indicates degrees of a trait that offers insight into how you process information, interact with the world, and more.

It really is a remarkable way of coming to understand the people around you and gain insight into why they behave the way they do, and how you can get along and communicate with them more effectively. Not only is it a great tool to help you understand others, but it’s a great tool to help you understand yourself and why you think and behave the way you do. The test itself only takes about ten minutes, but figuring out your personality type and what it means can change your life. Take the test here.

United States Surpasses One Million COVID-19 Cases, GDP Falls 4.8%

Stephen Sorace, writing for Fox News:

The United States recorded 1 million coronavirus cases Tuesday, the first nation in the world to reach the grim milestone […]

The mounting infections across the U.S. come as the death toll exceeded 57,000, according to a tally by Johns Hopkins University.

Lucy Bayly, for NBC News:

The coronavirus pandemic has slammed into the economy so hard the nation's GDP has fallen by 4.8 percent, bringing the longest economic expansion on record to an abrupt halt. […]

It's the steepest decline since the Great Recession, which ended in 2009.

None of this is surprising, given how well our federal government has handled this. Can you even imagine what people would be saying about Obama if Swine Flu, Ebola, or Zika had infected and killed so many Americans, or had caused the economy to fall into a tailspin like the one we’re experiencing now? Especially given that the president didn’t take the steps recommended to him by health officials in the early days, forced all of the hard decisions on to the governors, and still hasn’t been able to produce results when it comes to significantly boosting our capacity to test for the virus; there would’ve been legitimate calls for impeachment.

🇺🇸 United States: 0

🦠 COVID-19: 11



Check out CopyrightBro’s COVID-19 coverage roundup.

A Modern Dilemma Concerning Separation of Church & State

Here’s the thing:

Starting soon, employees of churches and other faith based, tax exempt organizations who have experienced lay offs and hour reductions as a result of COVID-19 will be eligible to receive unemployment benefits under the Pandemic Unemployment Assistance program included in the CARES Act (Congress’s $2T bill that included the $1,200 stimulus check and small business paycheck protection loans).

From The U.S. Department of Labor:

Depending on state law, covered individuals may also include clergy and those working for religious organizations who are not covered by regular unemployment compensation.

I’m not going to beat around the bush, this is unfair.

If someone were to theoretically refuse to pay in to social security for their whole life, and then expect the government to fund their retirement when they reach age 65, everyone would agree that’s unfair. People often label social security as a socialist program in the first place with massive solvency issues (technically true statements), but in a scenario such as the one described above, it’s not socialism, it’s a perversion of socialism and an outright slap in the face to free market capitalism. There is no individual scenario nor economic system where it’s fair to refuse to contribute to society and then demand that society gives you or the people who work for you a handout when times get tough, even exceptionally and unforeseeably so, as they have as a result of COVID-19. And make no mistake: this is a perverted socialist handout.

To employees of these organizations, I say this:

A hallmark of free market capitalism is that employers and employees negotiate their own contracts for pay and benefits. If you chose, whether out of ignorance and apathy or via an informed decision, to work for an organization who refuses to pay in to a social safety net program that could help you personally in the event that you come upon hard times, that’s your problem. In our current system (whether you agree with it or not) it’s your prerogative to negotiate for the benefits you may need, whether that’s unemployment insurance, health insurance, retirement packages, or otherwise.

To the employers, I say this:

Separation of church and state is a two way street; if you want to register your faith based organization as a nonprofit so that you can play by a different set of rules and avoid taxes, so be it, but don’t expect to reap the benefits of the tax dollars that every other small business has to contribute. I don’t care if your organization’s income is based on tithing and therefore allegedly unpredictable, nor do I care about any of the other excuses that may be offered. If your organization wants to operate in this economy and not pay taxes, your management had better be good enough to keep the organization afloat when hard times hit, because when you scream about separation of church and state, you cut the safety net out from under yourself.

Looking Forward

At the end of the day, do I think we ought to just leave the people who will benefit from the PUA program to suffer? No, I don’t, because that’s not the right thing to do. Even though, if we didn’t bail them out, they’d blame Nancy Pelosi until the end of time and blabber on incessantly about the “persecution” of Christians.*

Politics is often a tit for tat game these days, and kicking people while they’re down as opposed to offering them a hand will do a lot less to bring our country back together. However, I think people who are going to receive these benefits owe it to the rest of society to accept them with a bit of humility, understand why special rules had to be put in place to accommodate them, and be a little more careful to vet the organizations they go to work for in the future. I’ll be far less sympathetic the next time something like this happens if they do nothing this time to show their appreciation or prevent themselves from ending up in this predicament again.

*Christians obviously make up the largest faith community in the United States, but let’s be clear, my opinions apply to faith based organizations of any creed, whether they fall under the umbrella of Christianity, Judaism, Islam, or anything else.

Check out CopyrightBro’s COVID-19 coverage roundup.

Apple and Google Partner On COVID-19 Contact Tracing Technology

From the Apple Newsroom:

Apple and Google will be launching a comprehensive solution that includes application programming interfaces (APIs) and operating system-level technology to assist in enabling contact tracing. Given the urgent need, the plan is to implement this solution in two steps while maintaining strong protections around user privacy.

As I noted in a piece titled “The New Patriot Act” a few weeks ago, I am staunchly opposed to the implementation of any sort of mandated contact tracing surveillance system.

As a general rule, I trust Apple implicitly when it comes to privacy matters, so this piece of news about Apple partnering with Google to build contact tracing technologies was startling to me upon first glance. However, after reading their Newsroom briefing, it seems to me that Apple is doing this for the sake of consumer privacy rather than in spite of it: by announcing the development of a contact tracing system before one could be created by the government, they’re making it much more likely that a mandatory surveillance system from the government will never come to fruition, allowing citizens the privacy of an opt-in system provided by the free market.

First, in May, both companies will release APIs that enable interoperability between Android and iOS devices using apps from public health authorities. These official apps will be available for users to download via their respective app stores.

Second, in the coming months, Apple and Google will work to enable a broader Bluetooth-based contact tracing platform by building this functionality into the underlying platforms. This is a more robust solution than an API and would allow more individuals to participate, if they choose to opt in, as well as enable interaction with a broader ecosystem of apps and government health authorities.

The approaches they’re taking do seem to respect user privacy, in that they’re requiring users to explicitly opt-in and that they're creating these systems in a way that they can function without any GPS data (though I’m concerned about the ease with which nearly all of this anonymous proximity location could be associated with real world locations).

There are other instances of contact tracing happening in the United States already (not to mention the outright surveillance systems being used by Iran, China, and Israel). For instance, Massachusetts is implementing an old school contact tracing system to slow the spread of COVID-19 that involves employees calling infected patients and all of their contacts to create social maps of potential infections among contact networks, very similar to the (frankly offensive and regressive) programs utilized by public health departments when a new case of a sexually transmitted infection is reported to them (a legally mandated practice, even if you are diagnosed with an STI at a private practice), whereby the health department takes it upon themselves to contact the patient and demand they tell them who all they’ve been bedding down with so they can stir shit up and make the patient and anyone else they contact feel bad about themselves because our society is fundamentally built upon the puritanical notion that sexuality is an inherently shameful aspect of the human condition; I digress, the point is that contact tracing is not a process that respects privacy and I have little confidence that the government will get it right this time around, whether its done digitally or the old fashioned way.

I still believe our best options for combating COVID-19 are frequent hand washing and sanitizing, maintaining distance in public spaces, wearing masks when around crowds, and expanded testing for people who currently may have the virus, as well as antibody tests to determine who has acquired immunity.

I am not likely to opt in to any sort of tracking, and I would encourage you to strongly consider the long term consequences of allowing systems like this to get a foothold in our society.

Check out CopyrightBro’s COVID-19 coverage roundup.

CDC Decides Masks Do Work After All

The CDC is now changing course and recommending that Americans use face masks while in public to prevent the spread of COVID-19.

It never made much sense to me that our government would tell citizens NOT to use face masks as a measure to prevent the spread of COVID-19: it just isn’t logical to think that wearing a mask wouldn’t be at least slightly more effective than not wearing a mask. We may never get a clear answer for why they told us not to wear masks, but at this point, one thing is clear: they have utterly failed us.

🇺🇸 United States: 0

🦠 COVID-19: 5

Yes, face masks look kinda funny, and yes, it feels a bit uncomfortable, but the virus is still spreading at an alarming rate in the United States (special thanks to the Trump administration for their superb handling of this issue before it could become a full blown crisis 🙄) and wearing a mask WILL help protect you. If you can get your hands on N95 masks, those are the most effective, but standard surgical masks work too, and even homemade cloth masks can go a long way towards preventing you from catching COVID-19. In addition to being a physical barrier against aerosols and small liquid particles that can carry the virus, masks also serve as a physical reminder not to touch your face while you’re in public, so it does double duty to protect you.

If you’re going out in public, wear a mask and maintain at least six feet of space between yourself and others. Clean the groceries and other items you’re bringing into your home. When you do have to go out and buy things, at least try to support your local businesses. And for god’s sake, wash your hands often.

Check out CopyrightBro’s COVID-19 coverage roundup.

Current COVID-19 Statistics

Christopher Weaver, reporting for The Wall Street Journal:

All lab tests have some margin of error, measured in terms of sensitivity— the percent of positive cases a test accurately detects—and specificity, the percent of negative cases it accurately detects. […]

[Experts estimate] that the sensitivity of the tests is in the neighborhood of 70%, meaning nearly one in three positive patients walks away with a reassuring negative result.

It doesn’t take an epidemiologist to see why 30% of COVID-19 positive patients being told it’s safe for them to return to business as normal is a huge problem. On top of that, NPR reports that experts believe up to 25% of COVID-19 positive patients could be asymptomatic but still infectious.

One of the [pieces of] information that we have pretty much confirmed now is that a significant number of individuals that are infected actually remain asymptomatic. That may be as many as 25%.

These statistics are alarming by themselves, but combined… absolutely harrowing. As of today, the United States has 275,586 confirmed cases of COVID-19, and 7,087 Americans have died from it.

🇺🇸 United States: 0

🦠 COVID-19: 4



Check out CopyrightBro’s COVID-19 coverage roundup.

FDA Changes Restriction On MSM Blood Donations

Until this month, the official FDA guidelines for who should be deferred when trying to donate blood instructed healthcare providers to defer any man who had had sexual contact with another man in the past 12 months (in the healthcare industry, the acronym “MSM“ is used as shorthand for “men who have sex with men”).

The FDA has now changed the MSM deferral from 12 months to 3 months in an effort to increase the supply of blood during the COVID-19 pandemic. Is this a positive change? Yes. But it feels as if this change only coming about because a few powerful, bigoted people realized that this pandemic is really leaving them up the creek without a paddle. They need help (to save lives, but also to save their reputations), so they’re turning to a group they had illogically deferred in bad faith.

Of course, men who have sex with men have always been able to lie and donate blood anyway, but that isn’t the point. The point is that these guidelines are archaic, discriminatory, scientifically unfounded, and stigmatizing, and simply reducing the timeline that determines who should be deferred doesn’t make it better when the underlying reason for the deferral remains the same.

If you are a same sex attracted man (whether you identify as gay, bisexual, or otherwise), I encourage you not to donate blood as a matter of principle — regardless of whether you’ve had sex in the last three months, the past year, the past hour, or ever in your life — until these absurd guidelines are completely done away with. If the people making these rules want our help, they should have to earn it.

Check out CopyrightBro’s COVID-19 coverage roundup.

Trump: 100k-200k COVID-19 Deaths Would Mean A Job Very Well Done

Tom Porter, writing for Business Insider:

President Donald Trump spent the early phase of the coronavirus outbreak in the US downplaying its likely impact

This is, of course, despite having received multiple reports from our intelligence agencies indicating that COVID-19 could become a disastrous pandemic if not handled properly.

In a press conference on Sunday, Trump sought to set new parameters for what would constitute a successful handling of the virus, saying that 100,000 or fewer deaths in the US would constitute a "very good job."

About a month ago, on February 26, he predicted that in a matter of days the total number of coronavirus cases in the US would be "close to zero." Instead, the US now has the most confirmed cases of any nation.

When you suck at your own game, just change the rules. As of today, more people have died from COVID-19 than the attacks on 9/11.

Unfortunately, the only game Trump really cares about is the rating game.

Hitherto unseen levels of sociopathic narcissism, folks. Are we great again, yet?

🇺🇸 United States: 0

🦠 COVID-19: 3

UPDATED: 04/03/20, 22:25

Check out CopyrightBro’s COVID-19 coverage roundup.

On The Deployment of Facts

Monica Black, writing for The Sewanee Review:

But the reality is that sometimes what matters—and what really moves the wheels of history, as Mussolini might have put it—is what you can make out of the facts. Sometimes myths are much more compelling than humble, modest truths. In that sense, it did not matter much whether the Reichstag fire was set by a young communist who opposed the Nazis, or if that’s merely what they said happened. What mattered was the chain of events that flowed from the fire, and what the Nazis made of those events. What mattered was how the facts were interpreted and put to work.

By the way, just yesterday, one of our illustrious Tennessee state senators, Frank Niceley—who in 2013 addressed the Southern National Congress, which the Southern Poverty Law Center says is an offshoot of the neo-Confederate hate group League of the South—posted this question to Twitter: “isn’t it a #Fact that #COVID-19 originated in #China?”

Dr. Black is an Associate Professor of History at The University of Tennessee, and she also happened to be my thesis advisor. Additionally, I had the pleasure of taking her course “Medicine in The Third Reich”, during which I was consistently delighted by her thought provoking lectures which always provided a historical lens useful to interpret the present, and were somehow always intriguingly relevant to current events while following an established syllabus.

Her remarks here are also very thought provoking, and we would do well to heed the warning: in times of uncertainty and crisis, we need to be questioning the “facts”, but we also need to be paying attention to how certain facts may be deployed to bolster agendas.

Sure, the coronavirus started in China. That is a fact. But does this fact help us slow its spread, stabilize the economy, or help the sick recover? No. Is it consistent with Donald Trump’s (and his pals’) nationalistic tendency to deflect blame for the United States’s shortcomings by painting them as foreign threats? Certainly. If you’d like an example, look no farther than the wall Trump promised (and failed) to build as a silver bullet measure to solve our broken immigration system and bring back “stolen” jobs.